Skip to main content

From one-Sided to two-Sided CfD: Germany’s EEG Draft brings new momentum to the support mechanism

The European Union has set the framework: national member states are to further develop their support systems for renewable energy toward two-sided Contracts for Difference (CfDs). Germany is now implementing this requirement. With the recently published EEG (Renewable Energy Act) draft, not only is the system being adjusted, but a new calculation logic for determining the market premium is also being introduced. Two new key variables are central here: the refinancing contribution and the “adjusted” refinancing contribution.

But what exactly is changing and how does the new regulation differ from the previous logic?

April 23rd, 2026
Deutscher Windpark

Starting point: the previous market premium

In the previous EEG system, the well-known market premium functionally corresponded to a one-sided CfD:

If the market value was below the reference value, plant operators received a compensation payment (market premium).

If the market value was above it, there was no obligation for repayment by the operator, and “excess revenues” could be retained.

However, even here there is already a special rule for newer plants under Section 51 EEG: the market premium is not paid (or falls to zero) for generation during (quarter-) hours with negative spot prices.

Thus, the core formula for calculating the market premium was:

Market premium (MP) = Reference Value (RV) – Yearly Market value (MV)

Payment only occurred if MV < RV

No repayment if MV > RV

The result was effectively a one-sided downside protection in the market i.e., the state compensated plant operators.

Market premium model
Graph 1: Historical Analysis 2023–25. In 2023, the spot price (JW) was above the average price (AW) (here, €55/MWh). Following the decline in electricity prices in 2024 and 2025, the spot price fell below the average price again, resulting in market premium payments.

From a one-sided support system to a two-sided CfD

With the new system, the former one-sided (asymmetric) CfD becomes a two-sided (symmetric) CfD. This means:

If MV < RV, the market premium continues to be paid.

If MV > RV, a claw-back mechanism now applies. Payments are made to the state - the so-called “refinancing contribution.”

This changes the revenue calculation logic for EEG-supported plants. The calculation of the market premium (i.e., payments from the state when market values are low) remains the same:

MP = RV – MV

If the value is negative, it is set to zero (MP = 0).

In addition, the second side of the CfD now applies: payments from the plant operator to the state. These occur when the (annual) market value exceeds the reference value. The refinancing contribution is calculated as:

If the Refinancing contribution (RC) = MV – RV

value is negative, it is set to zero (RC = 0).

Symmetric CfD
Graph 2: Looking at the past few years, with a reference value of €55/MWh, compensation payments to the government would have been required only in 2023.

Adjusted refinancing contribution

The new EEG draft also introduces an “adjusted refinancing contribution.” This applies when, in a given quarter-hour, the spot market price is less than or equal to the sum of the refinancing contribution and a minimum revenue:

Spot price ≤ RC + minimum revenue

In this case, the adjusted refinancing contribution is calculated as:

Adjusted RC = Spot market price – minimum revenue

The minimum revenues are fixed by technology:

Offshore wind: 1.5 ct/kWh

Solar: 0.5 ct/kWh

Other: 1 ct/kWh

This adjusted refinancing contribution ensures that operators can retain a minimum level of revenue when electricity prices are low.

Minimum revenue symmetrical CfD
Graph 3: The adjusted refinancing contribution applies only if MV > RV and, at the same time, the spot market price is below the refinancing contribution. In that case, a technology-specific minimum revenue is granted to the plant operator.

Political asessment of the potential new support system

The market premium was and is intended to provide plant operators with security in the form of minimum revenues. This protection will remain in the future, as support payments will still be made when the annual market value is below the reference value.

It can be assumed that, in the absence of fossil-fuel price shocks, annual market values will continue to lie below the reference value. However, if the annual market value does exceed the reference value, the direction of payments reverses, and compensation payments are made to the state.

Plant operators also have the option to leave the support scheme and market their electricity independently. In that case, no refinancing contribution is required - but returning to the support scheme would no longer be possible. This detail gives operators a certain degree of flexibility, while also supporting market integration of renewable energy and enhancing the sense of fairness from the state’s perspective.

From the perspective of plant operators, this minimally invasive adjustment to the existing market premium model is likely to be viewed positively. The new EEG draft meets EU requirements without fundamentally overturning the system. A financing basis remains in place. Current challenges lie elsewhere, and there is relief that no additional pressure points are being introduced here.

Explore multiple scenarios for renewable deployment and power price developments

Verfügbar auf Deutsch