data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6eecd/6eecd2d3ab2461abe24a68866f0798258c6257c8" alt="Granular Guarantees of Origin (GGO)"
February 28th, 2025
As carbon reduction targets increase, businesses are turning to frameworks like the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) to assess and disclose their environmental impact.
CDP reporting refers to the process where organisations disclose their environmental impact through the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), a global non-profit organisation. CDP collects and scores data from businesses, governments, and investors on how they manage environmental risks, including carbon emissions, water usage, and deforestation.
The process involves submitting detailed information through CDP's questionnaires, which cover areas like greenhouse gas emissions, climate change mitigation efforts, and environmental strategies. CDP scores organisations based on factors like data quality, transparency, and alignment with environmental frameworks. The goal is to improve environmental transparency and drive sustainable practices while helping stakeholders make informed decisions.
CDP reporting is important because it promotes environmental transparency and drives meaningful action against climate change. Here's why it matters:
By disclosing environmental data, organisations gain a clear understanding of their environmental impact, including carbon emissions and resource usage, which helps them identify areas for improvement.
CDP reporting encourages businesses to adopt more sustainable practices, set emission reduction targets, and contribute to global efforts to combat climate change.
Investors increasingly prioritise sustainability. CDP ratings allow businesses to demonstrate their commitment to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) principles, making them more attractive to environmentally conscious investors.
As environmental regulations tighten, CDP reporting helps businesses stay ahead of compliance requirements by understanding and addressing their carbon footprint proactively.
Transparency in environmental practices enhances a company’s image, appealing to consumers and stakeholders who prioritise sustainability in their decisions.
CDP reporting plays a vital role in aligning corporate strategies with environmental stewardship, ensuring long-term resilience and relevance in a sustainability-driven economy.
The CDP reporting process involves a structured approach where organisations disclose their environmental impact and sustainability efforts. Here's a breakdown of how it works:
CDP releases its annual questionnaires in January, covering topics like climate change, water security, and deforestation.
Organisations can voluntarily disclose their data or respond to a direct request from CDP.
Companies gather relevant data and metrics, ensuring alignment with CDP's reporting requirements.
All disclosures are submitted through CDP’s online platform.
Organisations provide data on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (scope 1, 2, and 3), resource usage, and sustainability practices.
Reporting often aligns with other frameworks like Science-Based Targets (SBT) or the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI).
CDP evaluates submissions based on several criteria, including:
Adherence to GHG emission targets (scope 1, 2, and 3).
Verification and accuracy of data provided.
Ambition of climate mitigation and adaptation strategies.
Submissions are assessed against industry peers and global standards.
CDP scores organisations across four key categories:
Leadership: Excellence in climate strategy and execution.
Management: Active management of environmental risks and opportunities.
Awareness: Understanding and monitoring of environmental impact.
Disclosure: Transparency and quality of disclosed information.
Scores range from A (Leadership) to F (Failure to disclose).
Final Outcome: Organisations receive a Carbon Disclosure Rating summarising their environmental performance and readiness.
Strategic Insights: Businesses use these ratings to influence ESG strategies, improve practices, and position themselves as leaders in sustainability.
This process not only helps organisations understand and manage their environmental footprint but also provides a platform to communicate their efforts to stakeholders, investors, and the public.
CDP benefits businesses by providing a clear rating regarding their carbon emission reporting status. We explore the advantages of CDP reporting, both for the organisation reporting and potential new business connections.
Many businesses are now operating under what’s known as a carbon-conscious method. This means that they are assessing their carbon footprint by taking into account how the environmental behaviour of their supply chain and investments might be impacting their carbon footprint. Carbon Disclosure Ratings allow organisations to be completely transparent about their ESG activities, allowing investors or potential business connections to make informed decisions about whether or not to do business with your organisation.
Carbon reduction targets are approaching, with new policies and targets always on the horizon. Many new regulations and initiatives will mandate carbon disclosure in the future, so to avoid heavy penalties, it makes sense to monitor carbon emissions now and to make changes in advance of impending targets. Reporting to a body like the CPD will allow businesses to know their current compliance and prepare them for future changes.
Consumers are utilising purchasing power to buy from companies they believe to be attractive from a sustainability perspective, which makes the companies that consumers choose to spend their money with more appealing to potential investors. Organisations can use reporting to clarify their ESG initiatives, which improves brand reputation. This, in turn, can mean more consumers are attracted to their transparency, as consumers can see directly where their spending is going and how it impacts the environment around them.
Our top tips on optimising your environmental reporting:
Understanding is the key to good reporting - if you gain insight into the questions that are being asked as part of the CPD questionnaire, you have the potential to improve your company’s CPD rating. Be specific about the data you supply and always make sure you hit the required scoring criteria.
Invest in the tools that will allow you to implement the learnings and advice gathered as part of your final CPD rating, train the business to use them, and understand the recommendations. It’s difficult to impact meaningful change from a sustainability perspective if your organisation as a whole does not comprehend the data or generally understand why reducing carbon emissions is important to the organisation’s success.
CDP reporting and other ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) frameworks serve complementary roles in sustainability reporting. Here's a comparison to understand how CDP stands out and aligns with others:
Primarily focuses on environmental aspects such as climate change, water security, and deforestation. It emphasises carbon disclosure and environmental risk management.
GRI (Global Reporting Initiative): Covers a broad range of sustainability impacts, including environmental, social, and economic factors.
SASB (Sustainability Accounting Standards Board): Focuses on financial materiality and industry-specific sustainability metrics across all ESG pillars.
TCFD (Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures): Concentrates on climate-related financial risks and opportunities, often complementary to CDP.
Targets a wide range of stakeholders, including investors, businesses, and policymakers, with a strong focus on environmental transparency.
GRI: Designed for general stakeholders like NGOs, governments, and consumers.
SASB: Primarily aimed at investors and financial markets.
TCFD: Specifically geared toward investors, banks, and insurers.
Uses questionnaires tailored to specific environmental categories, such as climate change, water, and forests. It scores submissions to encourage accountability and improvement.
GRI: Offers a flexible, standardised reporting framework for all ESG aspects.
SASB: Focuses on concise, industry-specific standards for material ESG issues.
TCFD: Provides a framework for assessing climate-related risks and integrating them into financial disclosures.
Produces a Carbon Disclosure Rating (A to F) based on data quality, transparency, and environmental performance, helping organisations benchmark against peers.
GRI: Does not score but provides guidelines for comprehensive ESG reporting.
SASB: Does not issue scores; focuses on presenting material data for financial stakeholders.
TCFD: No scoring; emphasises qualitative integration of climate risks into financial statements.
Best suited for companies seeking to demonstrate environmental leadership, manage carbon risks, and attract sustainability-focused investors.
GRI: Ideal for broad sustainability disclosures across diverse stakeholder groups.
SASB: Preferred by organisations focused on investor communication and financial materiality.
TCFD: Crucial for companies addressing climate risks in financial strategies.
While CDP reporting is highly focused on environmental transparency and carbon-related impacts, other ESG frameworks like GRI, SASB, and TCFD provide broader or more specialised reporting tools. Organisations often use CDP in conjunction with these frameworks to deliver a holistic view of their sustainability performance.
Leverage real-time carbon tracking to reduce your carbon footprint and meet decarbonisation goals with our carbon intensity toolkit.
February 28th, 2025
February 27th, 2025
February 26th, 2025